As Kazakhstan confronts increasingly severe droughts, floods and extreme temperatures, farmers and environmental organisations are turning to relatively inexpensive methods of retaining water and restoring ecosystems. Their field experience calls into question the country’s exclusive reliance on mega hydro-engineering projects.

Kazakhstan is increasingly exposed to drought, flooding and extreme heat. A severe drought hit its southern and western regions in 2021, while widespread flooding in 2024 affected much of the country. These events have intensified the debate over how Kazakhstan should adapt to a changing climate.

While major water infrastructure projects form a central part of the government’s response, some farmers and conservationists argue that simpler techniques – including snow retention and soil-moisture management – also deserve attention. Their effectiveness depends on local conditions, but their relatively modest costs make them attractive in water-stressed areas.

Projects in the Aqtöbe Region and efforts to restore Lake Zhumay in the Aqmola Region illustrate the potential of locally led adaptation. They also raise a broader question: how can Kazakhstan combine major infrastructure investment with approaches that retain water within landscapes?

Read more on Novastan: Kazakhstan: Residents suffer from lack of water

Agro-Technical Adaptation in the Aqtöbe Region

Local farmers practice autumn cultivation to retain moisture in the fields, a technique also recommended as a flood-prevention measure. Marina Tsygankova, director of the “ElitAgro” public foundation in the Aqtöbe Region, considers field preparation for these purposes economically justified. According to her, combating floods by directing precipitation straight into deep soil layers at the site of snowfall is a rational strategy.

The alternative would be building special moisture storage reservoirs, but such technology is significantly more expensive and complex from an engineering standpoint. In the current economic climate – where state budgets face constraints and big business is hesitant to invest – emphasis must be placed on practices accessible to the population.

Mechanical snow retention remains a budget-friendly and effective solution for the dry steppe zone of Western Kazakhstan. Here, spring floods often turn into micro-disasters as rapidly melting snow rushes off fields in torrents, washing away fertile topsoil. Using tractors with snowplows and ridgers allows farmers to keep snow where it falls, protecting it from strong winds that typically blow winter precipitation into ravines and roadside ditches.

According to observations cited by local practitioners in the Aqtöbe Region, combining snow retention with autumn cultivation can help meltwater penetrate deeper into the soil. They report moisture reaching depths of up to 110 cm, compared with 45-60 cm on untreated sloping fields, and yield gains of up to 400 kg per hectare in some drought years. These site-specific figures should not be taken as typical results across the region. Practitioners also argue that keeping snow on fields can reduce topsoil erosion and limit snowdrifts on nearby roads.

Read more on Novastan: A disappearing river: the fate of the Ural

Asyl Baitleuov has been farming in the Martuk District of the Aqtöbe Region for 26 years, growing barley, sorghum, wheat, and sunflower across 3,000 hectares.

“We do not receive subsidies for snow retention,” Baitleuov explains. “If the snow cover is 50 to 70 centimeters, we leave it alone. Spring snowmelt plays a huge role: if it freezes at night and melts during the day, the earth absorbs the water. But if it melts around the clock, moisture washes off with the humus. We usually have a lot of snow, so we only do snow retention where accumulation is low – treating up to 500 sown hectares annually. Although costly, it generally pays off.”

Snow retention has also been used to help restore a dried-up lake. Ruslan Urazaliyev, a researcher at the Association for the Conservation of Biodiversity of Kazakhstan (ACBK), describes the effort at Lake Zhumay in the Aqmola Region:

“For the first time, we carried out snow retention in the Qorgalzhyn District of the Aqmola Region at Lake Zhumay,” Urazaliyev recalls. “The reservoir is a key ornithological territory attracting rare birds, including the Dalmatian pelican, white-headed duck, Pallas’s gull, and greater flamingo – all listed in Kazakhstan’s Red Book. Lake Zhumay also serves as a watering hole for livestock and poultry. In 2010-2011, due to a lack of moisture and high temperatures, the lake dried up completely.”

At the time, ACBK was implementing a project supported by the Global Environment Facility Small Grants Programme. Local resident Timur Iskakov helped initiate a snow-retention project, working with residents during the winter of 2012-2013 to build snow barriers around the lake. ACBK’s 2013 annual report records snow depths of 80 cm in treated areas, compared with 30-40 cm on open steppe. Urazaliyev says water returned in spring 2013 and the lake’s recovery continued into 2014. He stresses that the intervention accelerated a natural process: neighbouring lakes recovered without such measures approximately two years later.

Urazaliyev estimates that the work cost slightly less than 1.7 million tenge. The precise project cost and the lake-area figures cited in his account were not independently established from the historical reports reviewed for this article.

“Through our actions, we accelerated the natural restoration of an 885-hectare lake,” Urazaliyev summarizes. “Later, we successfully stocked it with crucian carp to support the food chain for fish-eating birds. In 2015-2016, residents of Arykty village in the Aqmola Region used our experience to refill a dried-up reservoir of their own.”

ACBK’s experience extends to other regions. In the Jambyl Region, the organization fostered ecotourism at Lake Qyzylkol through the local community, where visitors with cameras deterred poachers. Meanwhile, staff at the Buyratau National Park in the Karaganda Region used wooden snow shields to restore two drying watering holes for wild animals.

Nature-Based Solutions vs. Technocratic Megaprojects

Kazakhstan’s locally developed water-retention techniques reflect wider interest in nature-based approaches to climate adaptation. Bulat Esekin, an environmental policy expert, argues that restoring soils and natural water cycles should receive greater emphasis in public policy.

Read more on Novastan: The Caspian Sea Is Retreating. Central Asia Is Not Ready

“Instead of artificially altering riverbeds and building expensive structures, it is far more efficient to restore natural small water cycles and soils,” Esekin says. “What our farmers are talking about is proven worldwide: the Potapenko paradigm in Chuvashia or the methods of Slovak expert Michal Kravčík, who has spent over 20 years implementing simple water-retention techniques. Forests and healthy soils are the main drivers of the water cycle. Natural ecosystems can absorb and regulate flood peaks for free – and far more effectively than concrete – if we simply do not interfere.”

The government, meanwhile, is investing heavily in water infrastructure. Under its water-management strategy through 2030, Kazakhstan plans to build 42 reservoirs with combined capacity of approximately 2.6 billion cubic metres, reconstruct existing reservoirs and modernise more than 14,000 km of irrigation canals. The government says this investment is intended to strengthen water security, support irrigation and reduce flood risks.

Kazakhstan’s Comprehensive Plan for the Development of the Water Sector for 2024-2028 sets out 160 measures with planned funding of approximately 3.153 trillion tenge. Importantly, this total combines republican and local government budgets with extrabudgetary financing, including funds from international financial institutions and private investment. It should therefore not be interpreted as an allocation entirely from the state budget.

The high cost of reservoir construction is striking. For instance, to reduce flood peaks by up to 50% in the Esil and Jarkain districts of the Aqmola Region – and ensure the stable operation of the Sergeyevka and Petropavlovsk reservoirs – a counter-regulator on the Esil River is scheduled for construction in 2027. This single project costs 103 billion tenge. According to Dias Orazbekov, head of the Kazvodkhoz project office, an ADB memorandum is signed, financing negotiations continue, and the facility opens in 2028.

Could some of the goals of major water infrastructure projects also be achieved through smaller-scale local measures? Esekin argues that institutional incentives and the emphasis on large construction projects make nature-based alternatives less prominent in planning.

Researcher Ruslan Urazaliyev highlights a fundamental disconnect: “Water is treated purely as a resource. The Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation plans to build reservoirs based on a simple logic: take water and move it. But water is an element. The 2024 floods demonstrated human powerlessness before nature. All our infrastructure aims at collecting water, not keeping it in the ecosystem. Rivers are the planet’s blood vessels; disrupting their pathways brings us closer to water bankruptcy.”

“Building new reservoirs and encasing rivers in concrete is a strategic error,” Esekin adds. “These ‘grey’ strategies create an illusion of control but worsen the water and climate crisis by increasing moisture evaporation. In the US and Western Europe, there is a massive rollback, marked by demolishing hundreds of dams and abandoning small hydropower plants. Yet our ministry remains hostage to criteria from forty years ago. Over the past 30 years, business has subverted environmental filters.”

Institutional Barriers and the Path Forward

Reliable water monitoring remains a concern. The experts point to the decline in hydrological monitoring sites as a challenge for water management. Without consistent monitoring, forecasting water-level fluctuations becomes more difficult.

Farmers also point to the cost of fuel and machinery as a barrier to wider use of autumn cultivation and snow retention. Support mechanisms could make these techniques more accessible, although their benefits would need to be assessed under different local conditions.

For the experience of Aqtöbe farmers and conservation groups to inform national policy, experts interviewed for this article call for stronger evaluation of proposed water-management measures and closer engagement with local communities.

Esekin advocates mandatory assessments of the water implications of major public programmes, alongside greater consideration of water-saving technologies and nature-based alternatives. Landscape planning, digital tools and satellite monitoring could help decision-makers evaluate which combinations of interventions are best suited to individual watersheds.

Read more on Novastan: Talas and its people: life by a Central Asian river affected by climate change

Kazakhstan’s climate-adaptation challenge is not simply a choice between reservoirs and natural systems. It is how to assess the costs, benefits and ecological trade-offs of each approach, while giving local practitioners and affected communities a meaningful voice in the decisions that shape their landscapes.

Edited by Mathieu Lemoine.

Written by Helena Garkava.

The post How Kazakh NGOs and Farmers Are Adapting to Climate Change appeared first on Novastan English.

The pontoon bridge over the Amu Darya near Urgench in Uzbekistan makes it possible to cross the mighty body of water. Credit: Joachim Bohndorf

Find all of our photos of the day. You can buy some of these and receive them at home: here is the list! If you can't find your picture in the list, mail us to photo@novastan.org.

The post Land and water appeared first on Novastan English.

LIFE BY THE RIVER. More than four million people in Kazakhstan and Russia live in the Ural river basin. They are watching the river grow shallower as time goes by. The main reason for this is human activity, scientists say. Can the Ural River’s fate be altered?

This article was originally published in Russian by the Kazakh media Vlast.kz as part of the “Developing Journalism: Exposing Climate Change” project.

Alexander Chibilev who lives in Orenburg in Russia, is one of the world’s foremost experts on the ecology of the Ural River, which flows from the Ural Mountains in Russia to the Caspian Sea in Kazakhstan. He knows everything about it, or nearly everything. He started studying the river in the 1980s and has written many scientific publications on the subject. But when given such compliments, Chibilev says: “When people ask me what to do, I know more about what not to do, since I can analyse the mistakes of the past.”

And, according to him, there were many mistakes. There’s the development of unproductive, low-yielding land, now damaging the entire river basin. The Iriklinsky Reservoir, approximately 100km north of the Russian-Kazakh border, built for a power plant. The factories that continue to poison the water even now that they have closed.  

Want more Central Asia in your inbox? Subscribe to our newsletter here.

“No one has calculated the cost of these actions. Pollutants have accumulated in the bottom sediments and we do not know how much there are. We have inherited a ticking time bomb. We are now reaping what the twentieth century has sowed. And the additional environmental damage every year only aggravates the situation,” Chibilev says.

There are only preliminary, very inaccurate, estimates of the volume of industrial pollution, published in 2017 in a special report of the preliminary results of research on the Ural River. The report is based on material by scientists from Kazakhstan (A. K. Kenshimov, M. Shortanbaev) and the Russian Federation (Yu. M. Nesterenko, S. V. Levykin), edited by S. K. Akhmetov.

The report states: “20 billion tons of industrial waste have accumulated in the Ural basin. It includes waste from processing plants, overburden, and surrounding rocks. Thousands of hectares of land were reserved for landfill and industrial waste sites.”

The Ural river basin is the area of land where other rivers, known as tributaries or affluents, flow and drain into the Ural, supplying its water. In total, the Ural has 58 tributaries, the largest being the Sakmara, the Elek (or Ilek) and the Shaǵan (or Chagan). Since the construction of the Iriklinsky reservoir in the upper Ural, 80% of the river’s water comes from the Sakmara.

Dams are not the only problem

“Generally, reservoirs do not help preserve a river’s ecosystem. Many reservoirs built in a basin’s upper and middle parts are used inefficiently. Their use should be reviewed,” Alexander Chibilev says.

Do dams and reservoirs really affect the river’s water levels? According to Chibilev, the shallowing of the Ural was first observed in the 1970s. This is when construction of hydroelectric power stations, and therefore of large reservoirs upstream, began. Today, there are 12 large reservoirs in the Ural basin in addition to the Iriklinsky, each of which has a volume of at least 10 million cubic metres.

“There’s a joint commission on transboundary rivers aiming to preserve the river, but how can we preserve it if we build reservoirs in [the Russian republic of] Bashkiria, the very place where the runoff forms?,” Chibilev says. “The Volga barely exists anymore, instead there’s a cascade of reservoirs. A third of the water in the upper Ural basin is now regulated by dams and reservoirs. For many years, the main advantage of the Ural over the rivers of the south of the European Plain (Don, Dnepr, Dniester, Volga) was the low number of water reservoirs and dams in the lower and middle reaches.”

Deepening the riverbed is one of the most often suggested projects to save the Ural. But scientists disagree with this idea and view it as a risky venture.

Serik Hairov, head of a scientific and technical laboratory studying water resources in the Ural-Caspian Basin, says: “The amount of water will not change no matter how deep we make the riverbed. At the same time, there is the problem of pollution– tree trunks creating congestion, algae and mud. In nature, in a natural environment, various processes are at work. For example, a natural spring flood would wash away fallen trees and erode sand islands and shallows. Having a large number of blue-green algae, which we, people, dislike seeing in our rivers, is actually a good way to purify water from industrial pollution.”

Think globally, act locally

Galidolla Azidullin, head of the Ural-Caspian Water Inspection, is also sceptical about artificially clearing the riverbed. In his opinion, it is unthinkably expensive and meaningless.

“In fact, it is the canals and tributaries that flow into the Ural River that need to be cleared,” Azidullin says. “We have inspected the Ural-Kushum Canal and what we have seen is very depressing because dams and reservoirs have virtually stopped the flow of water. As a result, the canal is overgrown with reeds and algae. The water doesn’t flow.“

“The same is happening to small rivers in the Ural Basin – the Barbastau, the Derkul, the Big Uzen and the Little Uzen. So half of these small rivers no longer bring water to the Ural. It’s no surprise that the Ural’s water level is going down,” he adds.

Alexander Chibilev thinks it wrong to attribute the shallowing of the Ural solely to the presence of water reservoirs. Data from many years of observation show that even before the construction of the reservoirs the river had high-water and low-water years. These periods are cyclical and closely related to climate change.

Another climate issue also affects the Ural River: the melting of the ice caps. According to several scientists, icebergs breaking off from polar glaciers can cool the warm ocean currents of the Atlantic Ocean, impacting the weather in Eurasia. Chibilev also draws attention to the fact that global climate change affects every river in central Eurasia.

Read more: Talas and its people: life by a Central Asian river affected by climate change

“It is necessary to recognise that the true causes and extent of climate change, despite a large amount of data and predictions, are poorly understood. One thing is for sure: these changes are particularly sensitive in the central regions of Eurasia, where the Ural River basin is located,” he says. “The Don, Kuban, Terek, Volga, and Ural suffer from low water. And in the Altai and farther east, including the Amur river basin, there are catastrophic floods. Climate change is not sufficiently studied, partly because most of the surface of our planet is occupied by the ocean, which isn’t studied as much as inhabited land”

The human factor

The changes happening to the Ural have attracted the attention of the public because they are visible to the naked eye. More than four million people live on the banks of the river, anywhere along its course from the spurs of the Ural Mountains in Bashkiria, to its mouth in a tree-like delta in the Caspian Sea in Kazakhstan. They not only see what is happening to the river but are themselves the main cause of these changes. They use the river and consume its water. In official documents the influence of people on the Ural is denoted by the words “water use” and “water consumption”.

There’s also industrial water use. Factories take water from the Ural and discharge polluted water back into it.

“Because of this, we must take into account low water availability in our management of natural resources, give up high water consumption and be prepared for critically low water periods in the future,” Alexander Chibilev says.

He notes that there were extremely low water periods in the 1920s and in 1954-1955. And that, in contrast, in 1942 and in 1957, the Ural River overflowed and its violent currents even tore down railway bridges.

Sturgeons

Until recently, the Ural River was considered the world’s main supplier of caviar and sturgeon. In the 1970s, caviar from the Ural accounted for 40% of all black (sturgeon) caviar on the market. But in the 1990s, scientists warned that the sturgeon population was 40 times lower than twenty years previously. Nowadays there are generally no sturgeons upstream of Atyrau, a city by the Caspian Sea in Kazakhstan.

In the 70s, Chibilev compiled an atlas of sturgeon spawning habitats in the Ural River. He admits it is now hopelessly outdated but suggests the return of sturgeon could become a measure of the river’s rehabilitation.

He explains: “The replenishing of the sturgeon stock is something like a milestone, perhaps a utopian goal. And the presence of sturgeon in the river is an indicator of its ecological state. If sturgeon appear in significant numbers in the river, it means that the river is ‘recovering’. Like, for example, in the Rhine, Europe’s most polluted river in the 1960s. The “Salmon 2000″ programme was launched and salmon reappeared, though numbers are not at all on a commercial scale yet.”

The academic suggests Russia and Kazakhstan take concrete steps to restore the Ural River now. “Both states spend huge amounts of money on the restoration of the Ural,” he says. “But a cursory review of what it is being spent on is enough to understand that this money won’t have an effect. We spend a lot on conferences, round tables, and forums, and very little on concrete action. In my opinion, state bodies should direct their efforts towards giving the Ural a special status.“

“The Ural River and its tributaries, which have unique fauna and flora, supply water, possess valuable recreational resources, and in the area from Uralsk to the Caspian Sea, in general, are almost the only source of life, need a special status of protected natural territory,” he adds. “At least some parts of the rivers: the upper reaches and their springs, gorges on mountain rivers and valley areas with abundant floodplain forests and lakes, places rare species live in or migrate to, where valuable fish species spawn, etc.“

Read more: Troubled waters: Turkmenistan’s environmental policy

“Some countries have enshrined the status of “protected river” into law, for example. In Soviet times, a section of the Ural going from the mouth of the Barbastau to the North Caspian Sea, was a “protected area”. In the 1980s, we planned for the extension of this status to the mouth of the Ilek River. The joint Russian-Kazakh commission should work on the special status of our river, otherwise what was it created for?,” he concludes.

Тhe project “Developing Journalism: Exposing Climate Change” aims to identify the challenges of progressive climate change through the development and strengthening of independent media in Central Asia under the mentorship of experts from Media Development Center in Kyrgyzstan, Anhor.uz in Uzbekistan, Asia Plus in Tajikistan and Vlast.kz in Kazakhstan. The project is implemented by n-ost (Germany) and MediaNet International Centre for Journalism (Kazakhstan) with the support of the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ).

Lukpan Akhmedyarov and Raul Uporov

Translated from Russian by Valentine Baldassari

The post A disappearing river: the fate of the Ural appeared first on Novastan English.

LIFE BY THE RIVER. Three million people in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan live by the Talas River, where there is less and less water every year.

This article was originally published in Russian by the Kazakh media Vlast.kz as part of the “Developing Journalism: Exposing Climate Change” project.

The Talas is a transnational river: starting its life in the mountains of Kyrgyzstan, it vanishes in the sands of the Moıynqum Desert in Kazakhstan. Three million people live by the river, on either side of the border, and depend on it, especially for agriculture.

Want more Central Asia in your inbox? Subscribe to our newsletter here.

It’s impossible to miss how much the river has changed in recent years – there is less and less water. How will people’s lives change when the region becomes even hotter and the water level even lower? A group of journalists and environmentalists travelled hundreds of kilometres along the Talas to meet with the “people of the river” and find out how their lives are changing.

People of the road

Bayyzbek Sheraliev hails from the village of Konezavod in Kyrgyzstan’s Talas Region. He is 41 years old. His life is linked to the road: he clears snow and sprinkles anti-icing salt, mainly at the Otmok Pass, on the highway between the towns of Talas and Suusamyr.

“There are traffic jams in the Otmok Pass after every big snowfall, but before, when I started working, I noticed a much thicker snow cover,” Sheraliev says.

He also said there was less water in the rivers by the road each year. “It’s all climate change,” he explains.

The average annual temperature rose by 1.6 degrees Celsius in the past hundred years, significantly higher than the overall increase in the world, 0.6 degrees. At this rate, by 2100 the average temperature will have risen by 4.7 degrees in the best case scenario and by 6.1 degrees in the average case, according to Kyrgyzstan’s third national climate report.

Rising temperatures lead to glaciers melting and reduced river runoff. But Kyrgyzstan needs more and more water for drinking and for agriculture: its population is growing.

People of the land

Lack of water affects farmers most of all. Samat Osmonov is a dehkan farmer, a word used in Central Asia to describe small individual or family farms. His and his family’s livelihoods depend directly on irrigation. Like everyone else born in the area, he grew up by the river Talas.

“As far as I can remember, I always drank this water, used it to cook at home. We give it to the cattle, use it to water the vegetables. Nowadays my children help me carry water from the river in buckets or with a donkey. Here’s the problem: there’s less and less water in the river! My grandfather said that in his day there was so much water a horse could not walk through it, but now horses can cross without any problem,” the 40-year-old Osmonov explained.

“I also remember that when I was a child the ice on the river was so thick that fully loaded carts could cross without issue. Now the river still ices over but it’s so thin that you can’t even walk on it!”

Osmonov evokes a Kyrgyz saying: “When does man not suffer? When there is plenty of water. When everyone has enough of it!”

Scientists predict that in the coming decades, precipitation will increase in the mountains but that areas downhill could get more arid, leading to desert spreading and putting stress on ecosystems downstream.

The pull of the river

Vladimir Mazer has lived in Talas since 1965. He says that even when all his relatives emigrated to Germany, he could not imagine living outside of nature. Mazer calls himself “practically the last German” of the Talas Region.

He used to work as a hunter and now chairs the Talas Society of Hunters and Fishermen. Mazer met Vlast’s journalists by the source of the Kara-Koyun River, a tributary of the Urmaral River, which in turn flows into the Talas.

“There is not enough water in the river: it used to be that in the spring, at the beginning of summer, it wasn’t possible to cross the river at all, now people calmly walk across in galoshes! I also remember how on 22 November 2006, an UAZ car could not get up here because of the heavy snow. Today there’s barely any snow and the fish have become smaller. So I have not been fishing at all for two years: what’s the point of catching something so small?,” Vladimir Mazer says.

Climatologists say that in the next 25-50 years, the Talas and the Chuy, another river flowing from Kyrgyzstan to Kazakhstan, will be reduced to 25-45% of their current flow because of climate change.

Another example of the impact of climate change, according to Mazer, is the decrease in the population of wild animals.

“My “hunting life” began in this gorge in 1988. Back then, wild boars roamed freely, roe deer grazed freely. As for endangered species: you could see argali everywhere, I even saw myself how they weren’t afraid to go out on the road. But today, the argali has almost disappeared! And there are much fewer snow leopards,” he says.

“The average winter temperature used to be -22 to -25 degrees. Nowadays we get little snow. And if there’s no snow, there’s no food supply. Animals go where there is something to eat, “ Mazer explains. “If we’re talking about the human factor, then, believe me, the residents of the Talas region would rather cut up a ram for food than shoot argali! Those who raise a hand against them are poachers! This is also our reality. This year, poachers did raise their hand and shot two Himalayan brown bears.”

Mazer considers a complete ban on hunting to be the way out.

“If I had my way, I would set up a good protection system in the gorges and completely ban hunting for at least 10-15 years to help the animal world renew its population. While there are still ibexes. Sometimes we’ll get a bear, especially in the fall, when the rosehip is ripe.

Is it strange to hear a professional hunter talk about a hunting ban? But this is logical: if we do not protect the animals, there won’t be anything left to hunt! A professional would never kill endangered animals or young animals who can produce offspring. You go after what’s easy to go after. This is mainly old animals that will no longer reproduce. The hunter is not a forager, looking for food to fill the refrigerator, he has a professional passion,” he says.

Mazer also believes grazing should be regulated. “Shepherds will still bring cattle to graze, they have to: in the 90s, virtually no one grazed cattle here, but these days people live off what they raise. Every year there are more and more cattle and herds of horses gathering in the same gorge! On top of that, each shepherd has 5-6 dogs. Such a large number of animals on the same territory is called overgrazing and leads to the degradation of pastures and the loss of biodiversity,” he explains.

The hunter says that in Urmaral he recently detained four fishermen who had caught 103 trout: “Surely they’re not going to eat them! Clearly, they’re not just fishermen, they’re suppliers. Plain human greed is interfering with nature,” he asserts.

The entrepreneur

Mysa Zhanchikulov is 54 years old. Fifty of those years he spent in the city of Talas. He has fished in the river’s largest tributary, the Urmaral, since childhood.

Now Zhanchikulov is getting closer to fulfilling a long-held dream: he has rented ponds that were abandoned since 1974 for ten years, cleaned them and released fish. He dreams of reducing poaching, giving people jobs and setting up an area for recreation and amateur fishing.

“This will help preserve biodiversity in this area, preserve the environment. I want us all to learn to appreciate our land, where we were born and grew up,” he says.

Together with entrepreneurs from a neighbouring village, he brought drinking water to the area which, after use and recycling, is suitable for irrigation. He has now started cleaning up the surrounding area. To this end, he bought ducks and released them into the overgrown reeds around the ponds. He grows corn to feed the ducks.

Mysa wants Kyrgyzstan to eat more fish. This would mean breeding fewer animals for slaughter and thus help preserve their food base.

The young fisher

The older generation is not alone in noticing there is less and less water in the Talas. Young people see it too. Marat uulu Bayrak went to the Talas River to fish with his father, an enthusiastic fisher, from an early age.

“The river was very large, there was a lot of water. My father would often catch 40 kilograms of fish. These days, I sit for a long time, there is fish, but not very much and it is all small. Poachers catch everything with nets and the fish do not have time to grow,” the teenager says.

Now Marat fishes in the Kirov reservoir, on the border with Kazakhstan. Its main purpose is to irrigate the agricultural lands of the Talas Valley and Kazakhstan but many people use it as a place for recreation and fishing.

“Our neighbours also use this water,” the teenager says, pointing to the nearest slopes: “Look, you can see how the water level has dropped! It never used to sink lower than those trees on the slopes. There’s not enough water, we’ll have to feel it for ourselves soon.”

The healers

Saken Jumakeyeva, from the village of Boo-Terek, is 86 years old. She says that the Talas River gave her and her husband longevity and health.

They regularly pray to Allah and thank him for the fact that their native Kyrgyzstan has so many natural springs. “If the source is pure, then the spring is clean. If the thoughts are pure, then the deeds are nobles”

In Kyrgyzstan, there are hundreds of sources one can drink from or collect water from to bring home.

The Kyrgyz have long worshipped the Talas River and the sacred springs along its banks. They built mazar, or mausoleums, in the vicinity. The folk healer Erkinbubu Chomoeva talked about the Kanykeybulak mazar, a mausoleum near the Kenkol River, an affluent of the Talas.

“Sitting by a spring and not drinking water – that doesn’t happen,” Chomoeva says. She gives a long list of diseases that water from different springs supposedly cures.

“The area used to be abandoned but activists came, cleaned everything and improved it. Nature and springs should be treated with kindness and love, protected and preserved. By protecting our water springs, we are protecting our country. It teaches us to be kind and responsive, to love and care for the world around us,” she added.

Parents and children

Elnur Kainazarova comes from the village of Kopuro-Bazar. She is an engineer by education, now a mother and housewife. She says children should be taught to appreciate water from an early age: do not pollute it and spend it sparingly. This is what her parents and grandparents taught her.

“A love of water and an awareness of its preciousness has been passed down from generation to generation. Socially, not being careful with water is a very tense subject” says Elnur. She is convinced that extractive projects should only use advanced technologies that do not harm the environment.

Kopuro-Bazar is considered a prosperous village. Many here work in animal husbandry and agriculture to export to Kazakhstan. There is also the gold industry, with extraction and exploitation happening nearby, as in many villages built by affluents of the Talas.

The “river of gold”

The ecologist Gamal Soronkulov calls the Talas a “river of gold”. Right at its sources there are gold deposits: Jeeroy on the Uch-Koshoy River, Andash and Aktash on the right bank of the Karakol River. Downstream, almost at the mouth of the Talas’s tributaries, there are ore and scattered gold deposits.

Soronkulov, a native of the region, has a lot to say about the river. He grew up on its banks. “In the floodplain there is a beautiful forest – how rich Kyrgyzstan is! I remember that near the Kirov State Reserve there are flocks of gulls, cormorants, and herons that stay here for the winter. It’s beautiful,” he said.

The Talas, whose main water source is snow melt, flows for 661 kilometres until vanishing in the Moıynqum Desert. On the plain, its waters are used for irrigation and have been a subject of interest for both Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan.

“This is a river of neighbourliness, it is very important that it does not become a river of discord because of disputes over water!,” Soronkulov warns. “The Talas has been flowing for thousands of years, providing food and water. We have to keep the water clean and avoid quarrels with our Kazakh brothers”

Gamal Soronkulov has made it his personal mission and a matter of personal honour to prevent the exploitation of valuable mineral deposits. “It would lead to the destruction of the whole ecosystem of the river and the Talas valley: this means a change to the riverbed, the degradation of pastures, the destruction of flora and fauna in the region,” he says. “And all that for what? For the sake of the small amount of gold specified in the license. It’s unacceptable!”

The ecologist gives an example: “The license for the Urmaral deposit indicates that it contains 11 kg of gold. More than 600 hectares of beautiful floodplain forests is given away with it! If this plot were purchased at auction for $7,000, then one hectare of clean river, forest and pasture is ‘worth’ less than $10.”

Soronkulov is not against exploiting natural riches, but only if it complies with all environmental and sanitary standards and the profits are redistributed fairly. No one disputes the fact nature is a great natural capital. But with one condition: that it is used rationally, and not barbarically destroyed.

The Talas River Basin is home to about three million people in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan.

In 2000, the two countries signed an agreement on the water management of the river. With this document, Kazakhstan commits to paying Kyrgyzstan for part of the maintenance and repair of the canals, dams and reservoirs that ensure the supply of water to both even though they are owned by the Kyrgyz Republic. The agreement does not specify how the water should be divided so both sides adhere to the principles of equal distribution adopted in Soviet times.

Read more: Troubled waters: Turkmenistan’s environmental policy

Kazakhstan periodically complains that it does not receive the agreed-upon volume of water. However, Kyrgyzstan itself suffers from water scarcity.

The Chu-Talas Water Management Commission is a unique example of joint operation of hydraulic structures, joint solution-finding to problems of water allocation, and joint financing of such processes, which is in proportion to the share of water that each country receives. It is also a unique example of international cooperation on climate change in a transnational river basin.

However, the reduction of water due to accelerating climate change and human activity is a cause for concern for the two republics. Tensions can increase as the water levels decrease. Will the countries have time to make a difference?

Тhe project “Developing Journalism: Exposing Climate Change” aims to identify the challenges of progressive climate change through the development and strengthening of independent media in Central Asia under the mentorship of experts from Media Development Center in Kyrgyzstan, Anhor.uz in Uzbekistan, Asia Plus in Tajikistan and Vlast.kz in Kazakhstan. The project is implemented by n-ost (Germany) and MediaNet International Centre for Journalism (Kazakhstan) with the support of the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ).

Vlad Ushakov and Irina Bayramukova

Translated from Russian by Valentine Baldassari

For more news and analysis from Central Asia, follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, Linkedin or Instagram.

The post Talas and its people: life by a Central Asian river affected by climate change appeared first on Novastan English.